Re: [PATCH 1/3] net_dma: mark broken

From: Dan Williams
Date: Wed Dec 18 2013 - 13:06:00 EST


[ adding davem directly to cc ]

Dave, looking for an ack to take this through the dmaengine tree, and
wondering if you want me to take patch 2 through dmaengine as well:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=138732577614066&w=2

On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> net_dma can cause data to be copied to a stale mapping if a
> copy-on-write fault occurs during dma. The application sees missing
> data.
>
> The following trace is triggered by modifying the kernel to WARN if it
> ever triggers copy-on-write on a page that is undergoing dma:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 24 PID: 2529 at lib/dma-debug.c:485 debug_dma_assert_idle+0xd2/0x120()
> ioatdma 0000:00:04.0: DMA-API: cpu touching an active dma mapped page [pfn=0x16bcd9]
> Modules linked in: iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ioatdma lpc_ich pcspkr dca
> CPU: 24 PID: 2529 Comm: linbug Tainted: G W 3.13.0-rc1+ #353
> 00000000000001e5 ffff88016f45f688 ffffffff81751041 ffff88017ab0ef70
> ffff88016f45f6d8 ffff88016f45f6c8 ffffffff8104ed9c ffffffff810f3646
> ffff8801768f4840 0000000000000282 ffff88016f6cca10 00007fa2bb699349
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff81751041>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [<ffffffff8104ed9c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> [<ffffffff810f3646>] ? ftrace_pid_func+0x26/0x30
> [<ffffffff8104ee86>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> [<ffffffff8139c062>] debug_dma_assert_idle+0xd2/0x120
> [<ffffffff81154a40>] do_wp_page+0xd0/0x790
> [<ffffffff811582ac>] handle_mm_fault+0x51c/0xde0
> [<ffffffff813830b9>] ? copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+0x9/0x20
> [<ffffffff8175fc2c>] __do_page_fault+0x19c/0x530
> [<ffffffff8175c196>] ? _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x16/0x40
> [<ffffffff810f3539>] ? trace_clock_local+0x9/0x10
> [<ffffffff810fa1f4>] ? rb_reserve_next_event+0x64/0x310
> [<ffffffffa0014c00>] ? ioat2_dma_prep_memcpy_lock+0x60/0x130 [ioatdma]
> [<ffffffff8175ffce>] do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
> [<ffffffff8175c862>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
> [<ffffffff81643991>] ? __kfree_skb+0x51/0xd0
> [<ffffffff813830b9>] ? copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+0x9/0x20
> [<ffffffff81388ea2>] ? memcpy_toiovec+0x52/0xa0
> [<ffffffff8164770f>] skb_copy_datagram_iovec+0x5f/0x2a0
> [<ffffffff8169d0f4>] tcp_rcv_established+0x674/0x7f0
> [<ffffffff816a68c5>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x2e5/0x4a0
> [..]
> ---[ end trace e30e3b01191b7617 ]---
> Mapped at:
> [<ffffffff8139c169>] debug_dma_map_page+0xb9/0x160
> [<ffffffff8142bf47>] dma_async_memcpy_pg_to_pg+0x127/0x210
> [<ffffffff8142cce9>] dma_memcpy_pg_to_iovec+0x119/0x1f0
> [<ffffffff81669d3c>] dma_skb_copy_datagram_iovec+0x11c/0x2b0
> [<ffffffff8169d1ca>] tcp_rcv_established+0x74a/0x7f0:
>
> ...the problem is that the receive path falls back to cpu-copy in
> several locations and this trace is just one of the areas. A few
> options were considered to fix this:
>
> 1/ sync all dma whenever a cpu copy branch is taken
>
> 2/ modify the page fault handler to hold off while dma is in-flight
>
> Option 1 adds yet more cpu overhead to an "offload" that struggles to compete
> with cpu-copy. Option 2 adds checks for behavior that is already documented as
> broken when using get_user_pages(). At a minimum a debug mode is warranted to
> catch and flag these violations of the dma-api vs get_user_pages().
>
> Thanks to David for his reproducer.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: David Whipple <whipple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> index 132a4fd375b2..c823daaf9043 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ config NET_DMA
> bool "Network: TCP receive copy offload"
> depends on DMA_ENGINE && NET
> default (INTEL_IOATDMA || FSL_DMA)
> + depends on BROKEN
> help
> This enables the use of DMA engines in the network stack to
> offload receive copy-to-user operations, freeing CPU cycles.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/