[PATCH 3.10 60/78] dm array: fix a reference counting bug in shadow_ablock

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit ed9571f0cf1fe09d3506302610f3ccdfa1d22c4a upstream.

An old array block could have its reference count decremented below
zero when it is being replaced in the btree by a new array block.

The fix is to increment the old ablock's reference count just before
inserting a new ablock into the btree.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-array.c
@@ -317,8 +317,16 @@ static int shadow_ablock(struct dm_array
 	 * The shadow op will often be a noop.  Only insert if it really
 	 * copied data.
 	 */
-	if (dm_block_location(*block) != b)
+	if (dm_block_location(*block) != b) {
+		/*
+		 * dm_tm_shadow_block will have already decremented the old
+		 * block, but it is still referenced by the btree.  We
+		 * increment to stop the insert decrementing it below zero
+		 * when overwriting the old value.
+		 */
+		dm_tm_inc(info->btree_info.tm, b);
 		r = insert_ablock(info, index, *block, root);
+	}
 
 	return r;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/