Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: move all the bio initialization into__bio_alloc
From: Gu Zheng
Date: Thu Dec 19 2013 - 04:29:41 EST
Hi Kim, Yu,
Thanks for your review!
On 12/19/2013 04:59 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Gu,
>
> I agreed with Chao.
> It is more readable to use something like "is_read" instead of "rw".
Agree. I'll follow it.
Regards,
Gu
> Thanks,
>
> 2013-12-19 (ë), 09:23 +0800, Chao Yu:
>> Hi Gu,
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Gu Zheng [mailto:guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 6:29 PM
>>> To: Kim
>>> Cc: fsdevel; linux-kernel; f2fs
>>> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: move all the bio initialization into __bio_alloc
>>>
>>> Move all the bio initialization into __bio_alloc, and some minor cleanups are
>>> also added.
>>
>> Looks more neat!
>>
>>> @@ -178,17 +179,16 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_mbio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
>>> block_t blk_addr, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>>> {
>>> enum page_type btype = PAGE_TYPE_OF_BIO(fio->type);
>>> - struct block_device *bdev = sbi->sb->s_bdev;
>>> struct f2fs_bio_info *io;
>>> - int bio_blocks;
>>> + int rw = is_read_io(fio->rw);
>>
>> Maybe it's more neat to use 'is_read' to instead of 'rw'.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/