Re: [PATCH] dma: dw: Add suspend and resume handling for PCI modeDW_DMAC.

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 21:19 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:51:47PM +0530, Chew, Chiau Ee wrote:

> > As mentioned by Andy, we are using *_noirq  verion of suspend/resume PM
> > callback whereby the callbacks would be executed after IRQ handlers have been
> > disabled. If using SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, it would be the normal
> > suspend/resume PM callback. Looking at the Desginware DMAC platform code
> > (drivers/dma/dw/platform.c), it is using the *_noirq suspend/resume PM
> > callback. Is it advisable to use the normal suspend/resume PM callback instead
> > of *_noirq suspend/PM callback? 
> 
> i dont see a reason why we need the noirq versions

Okay. I imagine the following use case.

For example we have compiled in DMA driver (dw_dmac) along with, for
example, SPI driver.

System was scheduled to go sleep.

An order of calling IIUC might be DMA first, then SPI (since they are
not in parent / child relations).

What was happened when SPI would like to do a DMA transfer and DMA is
going to sleep? I'm trying to understand if this is a case.

> > > How about SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS instead?
> > 
> > So, we are using *_noirq versions of the functions here. What happened when we switch to normal ones? Any side effects?



-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/