Re: lockdep: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES too low!

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:01:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
 > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:59:17AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:51:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
 > >  > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:39:57AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
 > >  > > That discusses lockdep classes, which is actually fine in my case. I ran out of
 > >  > > MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES, which isn't mentioned anywhere in Documentation/ .
 > >  > 
 > >  > Yeah, it suffers from the same problem though. Lockdep has static
 > >  > resource allocation and never frees them.
 > >  > 
 > >  > The lock classes are the smallest pool and usually run out first, but
 > >  > the same could happen for the entries, after all, the more classes we
 > >  > have the more class connections can happen.
 > >  > 
 > >  > Anyway, barring a leak and silly class mistakes like mentioned in the
 > >  > document there's nothing we can do except raise the number.
 > > 
 > > I tried this. When you bump it to 32k, it fares better but then you
 > > start seeing "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!" instead.
 > > I've not tried bumping that yet, as I've stopped seeing these lately
 > > due to hitting more serious bugs first.
 > 
 > What are you doing to trigger all this? I don't see these. Are you
 > loading/unloading modules a lot?

syscall fuzzing.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/