Re: [PATCH v3] x86: sysfb: remove sysfb when probing real hw
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Dec 19 2013 - 12:09:37 EST
* David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > * David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> --- a/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> >> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> >>
> >> #include <asm/fb.h>
> >>
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> >> +#include <asm/sysfb.h>
> >> +#endif
> >
> > I think this can be written as:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > # include <asm/sysfb.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > also ... the dependency on a large, unrelated option like CONFIG_X86
> > looks pretty ugly here - is there no other, more specific CONFIG_
> > option that can be used here - such as CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE or
> > CONFIG_X86_SYSFB?
> >
> >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> >> + sysfb_unregister(apert, primary);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> CONFIG_X86 is probably never 'm'.. will fix that. It was
> CONFIG_X86_SYSFB before and that works, too, but the broader X86
> seemed more appropriate as sysfb is available on all x86.
Well, sysfb is available if CONFIG_X86_SYSFB is set, right? So on
!CONFIG_X86_SYSFB x86 kernels this code should not run, right?
> Note that I have patches here locally which move
> sysfb_register/unregister to drivers/video/sysfb.c and add
> include/linux/sysfb.h with dummies if CONFIG_SYSFB is not selected
> to avoid the #ifdef. This will allow other architectures to do
> gfx-hand-over, too. They seem too big for stable, though. That's why
> I split them up and added it to x86/kernel/sysfb.c first.
Yeah, it's fine to do those cleanups after the minimal fix. But using
a sensible config option must still be done - we cannot just slap
broad CONFIG_X86 dependencies into random code.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/