Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] futex: Avoid taking hb lock if nothing to wakeup

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 20:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 20:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > So, that's not a valid SOB sequence either, the person sending me a 
> > > patch should be the last person in the SOB chain 
> > 
> > Which is why I had it like that in the original version.
> 
> The problem with that order was that the first person should be the 
> primary author and in the 'From' tag.
> 
> A SOB chain is intended to depict the true propagation/route of a 
> patch, from author, through maintainers who handle and forward it, to 
> the maintainer who applies it to a Git tree. The patch starts up with 
> a single SOB (the primary author's) and every 'hop' after that adds a 
> SOB to the tail of the existing SOB chain.

Multiple "Signed-off-by:"s are also used when there are
multiple authors of a single patch.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/