Re: [PATCH] Perf: Correct Assumptions about Sample Timestamps inPasses

[David Ahern]

On 12/20/13, 5:27 AM, Joseph Schuchart wrote:
> I know this comes late, but: As far as I can see, your change does not
> preserve the logic of the code I suggested. The idea was to first gather
> all the maximum timestamps of all cpus (that is, the last timestamp seen
> on each cpu) and then determine the minimum of these maxima. These are
> two distinct steps that I think cannot be combined in one update. Your

 A number of people have reported similar problems -- timestamps below 
last flush time. This approach would solve that problem for data 
processed from files, so it would be a good improvement.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/