On Wednesday 18 December 2013 03:37 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:The system may crash if:
- there are more then 1 bank
s/then/than
- unbanked irqs are enabled
- someone will call gpio_to_irq() for GPIO from bank2 or above
Hence, fix it by not creating irq_domain if unbanked irqs are enabled
and correct gpio_to_irq_banked() to handle this properly.
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 5d163c0..1b33806 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -351,7 +351,10 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_banked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
struct davinci_gpio_controller *d = chip2controller(chip);
- return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
+ if (d->irq_domain)
+ return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
+ else
+ return -ENXIO;
}
static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
@@ -429,7 +432,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
- struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+ struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL;
ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
@@ -453,18 +456,20 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
clk_prepare_enable(clk);
- irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
- if (irq < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
- return irq;
- }
+ if (!pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
+ irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
+ if (irq < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
The code was correct before moving. Any objections to doing
return irq;
instead?
Thanks,
Sekhar