Hi Kishon,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:Hi Vivek,
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 09:14 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:Hi,
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 03:02 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:On Wednesday 20 November 2013 02:27 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:Hi Kishon,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:Hi,sorry for the delayed response.
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:37 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 2:58 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[.....]
USB3.0 PHY consists of two blocks such as 3.0 block and 2.0 block.
This USB3.0 PHY can support UTMI+ and PIPE3 interface for 3.0 block
and 2.0 block, respectively.
Conclusion:
1) USB2.0 PHY: USB2.0 HOST, USB2.0 Device
Base address: 0x1213 0000
2) USB3.0 PHY: USB3.0 DRD (3.0 HOST & 3.0 Device)
Base address: 0x1210 0000
2.0 block(UTMI+) & 3.0 block(PIPE3)
And this is of course the PHY used by DWC3 controller, which works at
both High speed as well as Super Speed.
Right ?
Right.
While 3.0 block(PIPE3) can be used for Super Speed, 2.0 block(UTMI+)
can be used for High speed.
It should then come under *single IP muliple PHY* category similar to what
Sylwester has done.
Do you mean that i should be including PHY IDs for UTMI+ phy and PIPE3
phy present in this PHY block ?
AFAICS the two phys (UTMI+ and PIPE3) do not really have separate
registers to program, and that's the reason
we program the entire PHY in a shot.
you mean you program the same set of bits for UTMI+ and PIPE3?
No, looking closely into PHY datasheet as well as Exynos5250 manual, i
can see that UTMI+ and PIPE3
phys have separate bit settings. So i think we should be able to
segregate the two PHYs (UTMI+ and PIPE3).
Pardon me for my earlier observations.
no problem..Let me clarify more with our h/w team also on this and then i will
confirm with this.
Did you get more information on this?
Yes, i have been in contact with our hardware team.
The functionality of setting up UTMI+ and PIPE3 phys separately, and
thereby using only one functionality of the two
at some point of time (either high speed or super speed) hasn't been
tested so far.
So i will be looking into this and try to find out proper init
sequences for the two available PHYs
separately and as soon as i get a working solution for this, i will update.
Thanks
Kishon