Re: [PATCH] perf list: fix --raw-dump
From: Dongsheng Yang
Date: Sun Dec 29 2013 - 21:58:46 EST
On 12/29/2013 05:11 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
So is the patch below the one to apply? When these things happen, it
helps if you resubmit with a v2 in the subject line and then an explicit
Ack is provided, be it from, in this case, David, or Ramkumar could just
add it since David provided it in free form, ok?
Is any action required on my part: should I resubmit this, or has it
already been picked up?
Hi Ramkumar,
I sent a patch set for enhancement of perf list recently,
[PATCH 0/8 V2] Enhancement for perf list.
<http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1388416837.git.yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
It contains a patch [6/8] is very similar with yours here. But I make it
works as a option for other argument, such as hw, too. And I add
a signed-off-by Ramkumar and signed-off-by David in that patch.
Do you mind we turn to that thread to fix --raw-dump ??
Could you help to take a look at it??
Yang
p.s- Sorry about the terribly late response; was on vacation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/