Re: [patch 2/2]blk-mq: Don't reserve a tag for flush request

[Jens Axboe]

On 12/30/2013 08:38 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> 
> Reserving a tag (request) for flush to avoid dead lock is a overkill. tag is
> valuable resource. We can track flush request number and disallow too many
> pending flush requests allocated. With this patch,
> blk_mq_alloc_request_pinned() could do a busy nop (but not a dead loop) if too
> pending requests are allocated and new flush request is allocating. But this
> should not be a problem, too many pending flush requests are very rare case.
> 
> I verified this can fix the deadlock caused by too many pending flush requests.

I think this looks pretty good, and it's a lot better than the hack that
is currently in place. The atomic inc/dec should be a noop on a per-hctx
basis, especially when it's only per-flush...

I'll get this queued up, with the ida fix too.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/