Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 09/12] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM XenBusand event channels for PVH.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

> > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> >  #include <xen/grant_table.h>
> >  #include <xen/xenbus.h>
> >  #include <xen/xen.h>
> > +#include <xen/features.h>
> >  
> >  #include "xenbus_probe.h"
> >  
> > @@ -743,7 +744,7 @@ static const struct xenbus_ring_ops ring_ops_hvm = {
> >  
> >  void __init xenbus_ring_ops_init(void)
> >  {
> > -	if (xen_pv_domain())
> > +	if (xen_pv_domain() && !xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> 
> Can we just change this test to
> 
> if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> 
> ?

No. If we do then the HVM domains (which are also !auto-xlat)
will end up using the PV version of ring_ops.
> 
> 
> >  		ring_ops = &ring_ops_pv;
> >  	else
> >  		ring_ops = &ring_ops_hvm;
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/