[PATCH 6/9] timekeeping: Fix missing timekeeping_update in suspend path

From: John Stultz
Date: Thu Jan 02 2014 - 17:23:46 EST

Since 48cdc135d4840 (Implement a shadow timekeeper), we have to
call timekeeping_update() after any adjustment to the timekeeping
structure in order to make sure that any adjustments to the structure

In the timekeeping suspend path, we udpate the timekeeper
structure, so we should be sure to update the shadow-timekeeper
before releasing the timekeeping locks. Currently this isn't done.

In most cases, the next time related code to run would be
timekeeping_resume, which does update the shadow-timekeeper, but
in an abundence of caution, this patch adds the call to
timekeeping_update() in the suspend path.

Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #3.10+
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 3f6a827..2793c43 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1024,6 +1024,8 @@ static int timekeeping_suspend(void)
timekeeping_suspend_time =
timespec_add(timekeeping_suspend_time, delta_delta);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, TK_MIRROR);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/