Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> enabled seqcount methods.
>
> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.

Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
tree, which is where the problem came from. No?

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/