Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: kprobes-test: use <asm/opcodes.h> forinstruction accesses

From: Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2014 - 10:53:33 EST


On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using
> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [taras.kondratiuk@xxxxxxxxxx: fix next_instruction() function]
> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then:

Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@xxxxxxxxxx>

and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too.

Thanks.


> arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> index 0cd63d0..96e3dbc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test.c
> @@ -1329,7 +1329,8 @@ static void test_case_failed(const char *message)
> static unsigned long next_instruction(unsigned long pc)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> - if ((pc & 1) && !is_wide_instruction(*(u16 *)(pc - 1)))
> + if ((pc & 1) &&
> + !is_wide_instruction(__mem_to_opcode_thumb16(*(u16 *)(pc - 1))))
> return pc + 2;
> else
> #endif
> @@ -1374,13 +1375,13 @@ static uintptr_t __used kprobes_test_case_start(const char *title, void *stack)
>
> if (test_case_is_thumb) {
> u16 *p = (u16 *)(test_code & ~1);
> - current_instruction = p[0];
> + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[0]);
> if (is_wide_instruction(current_instruction)) {
> - current_instruction <<= 16;
> - current_instruction |= p[1];
> + u16 instr2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(p[1]);
> + current_instruction = __opcode_thumb32_compose(current_instruction, instr2);
> }
> } else {
> - current_instruction = *(u32 *)test_code;
> + current_instruction = __mem_to_opcode_arm(*(u32 *)test_code);
> }
>
> if (current_title[0] == '.')
> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const union decode_item *table)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -

I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is
to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches.

> static int __init run_all_tests(void)
> {
> int ret = 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/