[PATCH] x86/boot: use .code16 instead of .code16gcc

From: David Woodhouse
Date: Fri Jan 03 2014 - 17:30:59 EST

This reverts commit 28b48688 ("x86, boot: use .code16gcc instead
of .code16").

Versions of binutils older than 2.16 are already not working, so this
workaround is no longer necessary either.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
Since I just made .code16 work in LLVM, this removes one more barrier to
building the kernel with LLVM/clang. And it looks like 'clang -m16' for
the C code in arch/x86/boot shouldn't actually be that hard to do now

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
index 1dfbf64..5077937 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
* touching registers they shouldn't be.

- .code16gcc
+ .code16
.globl intcall
.type intcall, @function
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/copy.S b/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
index 11f272c..07a7a4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
* Memory copy routines

- .code16gcc
+ .code16


David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature