Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

[Dave Hansen]

On 01/04/2014 03:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away.  I can't find any
>> reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code.  Is there some
>> /proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
>> /proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?
> 
> I don't know, but if it has gone then it is worth mentioning in the
> commit message

Maybe like this? ;)

> There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> /proc interface which was removed in 2007.

I guess I could call it out a _bit_ more clearly that I removed the
dependency because the code is gone.

> ... and you did preserve the dependency in the sparc64 case.

Ahh, I did.  I'll remove it.  Thanks!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/