Re: linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the tree
From: Olof Johansson
Date: Sun Jan 05 2014 - 19:06:20 EST
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> Today's linux-next merge of the imx-mxs tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-sabrelite.dts between commit 8f568b496dd9 ("ARM:
> imx: Explicitly pass the active level of the PHY reset") from the arm-soc
> tree and commit e5a5af250568 ("ARM: dts: imx: sabrelite: add Dual
> Lite/Solo support") from the imx-mxs tree.
> I fixed it up (just used the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
Thanks Stephen. The offending patch from the arm-soc side has been
dropped, but I didn't push out the new for-next yet. It should be gone
tomorrow. Same for some of the other imx conflicts.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/