Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tiptree

[Tang Chen]

On 01/07/2014 02:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c between commit f3d815cb854b ("x86/mm/numa: Fix 32-bit
> kernel NUMA boot") from the tip tree and commit 1459be89954e ("x86: get
> pg_data_t's memory from other node") from the akpm-current tree.
>
> These appear to be two very similar solutions, I fixed it up (see below -
> I (arbitrarily) chose to keep the actual allocation from the tip tree, but
> the messages from the akpm-current tree) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).

memblock_alloc_nid() and __memblock_alloc_base() will call
memblock_alloc_base_nid() in the end. So I think it is OK to me.

I will do some tests when they are merged.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/