Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] ARM: tegra: rework fuse.c
From: Peter De Schrijver
Date: Tue Jan 07 2014 - 09:10:48 EST
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:50:42PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Reduce fuse.c to the minimum functionality required for the early bootstages.
> > Also export tegra_read_straps() for use by the fuse driver.
> Since the fuse driver is tristate, it could be a module. Doesn't it
> literally need to be EXPORT_SYMBOL'd, not simply not static?
> I'm rather worried that this series isn't bisectable, since this patch
> removes a bunch of code that's replaced by code in the fuse driver which
> can't be built/linked at this point in the series. I'm also worried
> about initialization ordering, since a lot of the fuse code could be a
Maybe it should indeed never be a module...
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c
> > -/* Tegra20 only */
> > #define FUSE_UID_LOW 0x108
> > #define FUSE_UID_HIGH 0x10c
> Why remove that comment but leave the two defines it applies to?
> > #define TEGRA20_FUSE_SPARE_BIT 0x200
> That define, and tegra_spare_fuse() which uses it, are no longer used
> after patch 5/6, but aren't removed in patch 5/6. Perhaps it'd be better
> to squash or re-order the two patches, so this dead code can be removed?
> > -int tegra_sku_id;
> > -int tegra_cpu_process_id;
> > -int tegra_core_process_id;
> > int tegra_chip_id;
> > -int tegra_cpu_speedo_id; /* only exist in Tegra30 and later */
> > -int tegra_soc_speedo_id;
> > enum tegra_revision tegra_revision;
> It's a bit odd to remove most of this, but leave a few parts hanging
> around. Wouldn't it be better to the drivers/misc/fuse code to export
> this, so that /all/ the fuse logic was there, rather than part of it
> being left over in arch/arm/? We'll need to fix that up anyway when we
> start using these globals on ARMv8, so may as well get it right now.
> Also, I rather think that the new drivers/misc/fuse code shouldn't be a
> module or driver, so that we can guarantee it's always there to provide
> the globals and that they are initialized early enough...
tegra_revision is used in tegra_dt_init() to initialize soc_dev_attr->revision
Hence this needs to be available before the fuse driver is initialized.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/