Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] firmware loader: simplify holding module forrequest_firmware

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:53:57PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Ming,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:01:48PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> module reference doesn't cover direct loading path, so this patch
> >> simply holds the module in the whole life time of request_firmware()
> >> to fix the problem.
> >
> > This does not make sense to me. If request_firmware() is executing that
> > means some other module references it and module refcount already
> > reflects that.
> 
> Yes, you are right, holding this module references in both
> request_firmware() and request_firmware_direct() shouldn't
> be necessary.
> 
> >
> > We needed to pin module before Tejun's work ensuring that currently open
> > sysfs entries won't keep related kobjects pinned after kernel marked
> > them inactive. We can probably delete __module_get()/module_put() from
> > firmware_class.c now.
> 
> But holding the reference for request_firmware_nowait() is needed.

Ah, yes, of course.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/