[PATCH 3.8 078/166] cpupower: Fix segfault due to incorrect getopt_long arugments
From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Wed Jan 15 2014 - 17:04:36 EST
3.8.13.16 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit f447ef4a56dee4b68a91460bcdfe06b5011085f2 upstream.
If a user calls 'cpupower set --perf-bias 15', the process will end with
a SIGSEGV in libc because cpupower-set passes a NULL optarg to the atoi
call. This is because the getopt_long structure currently has all of
the options as having an optional_argument when they really have a
required argument. We change the structure to use required_argument to
match the short options and it resolves the issue.
This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000439
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c
index dc4de37..bcf1d2f 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
#include "helpers/bitmask.h"
static struct option set_opts[] = {
- { .name = "perf-bias", .has_arg = optional_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 'b'},
- { .name = "sched-mc", .has_arg = optional_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 'm'},
- { .name = "sched-smt", .has_arg = optional_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 's'},
+ { .name = "perf-bias", .has_arg = required_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 'b'},
+ { .name = "sched-mc", .has_arg = required_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 'm'},
+ { .name = "sched-smt", .has_arg = required_argument, .flag = NULL, .val = 's'},
{ },
};
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/