Re: [RFC PATCH V4] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for no localmemory and limit readahead pages

[Raghavendra K T]

On 01/10/2014 03:22 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 10-01-14 09:36:56, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 10-01-14 00:54:50, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> > > We limit the number of readahead pages to 4k.
> > >
> > > max_sane_readahead returns zero on the cpu having no local memory
> > > node. Fix that by returning a sanitized number of pages viz.,
> > > minimum of (requested pages, 4k, number of local free pages)
> > >
> > > Result:
> > > fadvise experiment with FADV_WILLNEED on a x240 machine with 1GB testfile
> > > 32GB* 4G RAM  numa machine ( 12 iterations) yielded
> > >
> > > kernel       Avg        Stddev
> > > base         7.264      0.56%
> > > patched      7.285      1.14%
> >    OK, looks good to me. You can add:
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
>    Hum, while doing some other work I've realized there may be still a
> problem hiding with the 16 MB limitation. E.g. the dynamic linker is
> doing MADV_WILLNEED on the shared libraries. If the library (or executable)
> is larger than 16 MB, then it may cause performance problems since access
> is random in nature and we don't really know which part of the file do we
> need first.
>
> I'm not sure what others think about this but I'm now more inclined to a
> bit more careful and introduce the 16 MB limit only for the NUMA case. I.e.
> something like:

Hi Linus, Andrew,

Could you please let us know your suggestion or comment?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/