Re: [PATCH] dcache: fix d_splice_alias handling of aliases
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Fri Jan 17 2014 - 07:17:35 EST
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:17:49AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> d_splice_alias can create duplicate directory aliases (in the !new
> case), or (in the new case) d_move without holding appropriate locks.
> d_materialise_unique deals with both of these problems. (The latter
> seems to be dealt by trylocks (see __d_unalias), which look like they
> could cause spurious lookup failures--but that's at least better than
> corrupting the dcache.)
I'm a bit worried about those spurious failures, maybe we should
retry in that case?
Also looking over the changes I wonder if the explicit cecking for
aliases for every non-directory might have a major performance impact,
all the dcache growling already was a major issues in NFS workloads
years ago and I dumb it's become any better.
Also looking at this area I'd like to suggest that if you end up
merging the two I'd continue using the d_splice_alias name and
Also the inode == NULL case really should be split out from
d_materialise_unique into a separate helper. It shares almost no
code, is entirely undocumented to the point that I don't really
understand what the purpose is, and the only caller that can get
there (fuse) already branches around that case in the caller anyway.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/