Re: [PATCH] rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri Jan 17 2014 - 12:14:55 EST
* Mike Galbraith | 2013-12-25 18:37:37 [+0100]:
>On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 23:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 04:07:34AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>Having sufficiently recovered from turkey overdose to be able to slither
>upstairs (bump bump bump) to check on the box, commenting..
>..those two out does seem to have stabilized the thing.
timers-do-not-raise-softirq-unconditionally.patch is on its way out.
rtmutex-use-a-trylock-for-waiter-lock-in-trylock.patch confues me.
Didn't you report once that your box deadlocks without this patch? Now
your 64way box on the other hand does not work with it?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/