[PATCH] API cleanup - use local_lock not __local_lock for soft

[Nicholas Mc Guire]

trivial API cleanup - kernel/softirq.c was mimiking local_lock. 

No change of functional behavior

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/softirq.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 2da729b..15ad603 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -505,12 +505,12 @@ void __init softirq_early_init(void)
 
 static void lock_softirq(int which)
 {
-	__local_lock(&__get_cpu_var(local_softirq_locks[which]));
+	local_lock(local_softirq_locks[which]);
 }
 
 static void unlock_softirq(int which)
 {
-	__local_unlock(&__get_cpu_var(local_softirq_locks[which]));
+	local_unlock(local_softirq_locks[which]);
 }
 
 static void do_single_softirq(int which, int need_rcu_bh_qs)
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/