Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] MCS Lock: Restructure the MCS lock defines andlocking code into its own file

[Tim Chen]

On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 13:07 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:08:16PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
> > + * time spent in this lock function.
> > + */
> > +static noinline
> > +void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
> 
> But given a vmlinux with sufficient DWARFs in, the IP will resolve to a
> .ista. symbol, no?

I'm actually only renaming the mspin_lock code to mcs_spin_lock here
and moving the code to header file.
The noinline logic was in the original code.  Later on when we move 
mcs_spin_lock to its own file and exporting the symbol, then I 
think this issue will be resolved.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/