On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Paul E. McKenneyOK, another approach would be to never add "select ARCH_USE_QUEUE_RWLOCK"
Yes, this requires that -all- updates to the fields in the machine wordI'm not seeing this.
in question use atomic rmw. Which would not be pretty from a core-code
perspective. Hence my suggestion of ceasing Linux-kernel support for
DEC Alpha CPUs that don't support byte operations. Also need 16-bit
operations as well, of course...
Why the hell would you have byte- or halfword-sized versions of the
store_release or load_acquire things on alpha anyway?
What it means is that data structures that do locking or atomics need
to be "int" or "long" on alpha. That has always been true. What do
you claim has changed?
on Alpha, at least if the queued rwlocks really do want to atomically
manipulate bytes. After all, the Alpha systems that I know about don't
have enough CPUs to make queued rwlocks necessary anyway.
Much simpler solution!
Is this what you were getting at, or am I missing your point?