Re: 2.6.34.x longterm stable status

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 08/07/2013 09:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>
>> - Shouldn't the EOL status be mentioned in the www.kernel.org front page?
> 
> It will be marked EOL at kernel.org when it is EOL.  Those that care
> about it being EOL would have seen the message about it becoming EOL in
> the previous 2.6.34.x release annoucement.
> 

Maybe it is time to check in on this?

I just noticed that this is now over a year since the last 2.6.34
release, which lags the last 2.6.32 release by about five months.  I am
asking because someone just queried me privately about the status of
2.6.34.  I'm worrying if people think that security patches are still
being backported if in fact they aren't.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/