Re: [tip:core/urgent] MAINTAINERS: Restore "L:firstname.lastname@example.org" entries
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Jan 22 2014 - 07:27:41 EST
* Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, SubmittingPatches had and still has:
> 6) Select your CC (e-mail carbon copy) list.
> Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Arguably, that same info should be added to the
> MAINTAINERS header instead of each section.
You have cut out my main argument from you reply and have ignored it:
>> In hindsight removing all the "L: lkml" entries was probably not
>> an overly good idea, not all mechanic duplication should be
>> eliminated: in files read by humans it's useful to have 'at a
>> glance' summary for all email addresses important to a subsystem's
>> maintenance, in a single place, without too many imported rules
>> and assumptions.
Which is not a very honest way to conduct discussions :-(
That section replies to most of your arguments.
> > b5472cddbe2c MAINTAINERS: remove L: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx from all but "THE REST"
> > So it turns out that it's all but intuitive, not all people
> > use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to extract maintainer contact info,
> > some people read the MAINTAINERS file and see the lack of 'L:' entries
> > of various lkml-only subsystems and are sending patches to the
> > maintainers only, without Cc:-ing lkml. They arguably have a point.
> shrug, I think it would be better if people
> used get_maintainer more often.
People are people, they'll use well constructed human-readable sources
of information like the MAINTAINERS file just fine.
> MAINTAINERS already says:
That's irrelevant really, reality tells us that good people are
looking at the entries and are using them as-is. For such things
technology should adapt to people, not the other way around.
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -4655,6 +4657,7 @@ F: net/irda/
> > IRQ SUBSYSTEM
> > M: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > S: Maintained
> > +L: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> If this is done, can you please standardize on
> placing the L: line immediately after the M: line
> and before the S: line as was done for all the
> other added lines.
Good point, fixed.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/