Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances ofinclude <linux/init.h>

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Linus,

On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:12:43 +0100 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > None of these files are actually using any __init type directives
> > and hence don't need to include <linux/init.h>.  Most are just a
> > left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to
> > code getting copied from one driver to the next.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Patch applied for v3.15.

Yet that patch is in linux-next today.  And just 2 days ago I mailed out this request (as I do during each merge window):

"Please do not add any code intended for v3.15 to your linux-next included
trees until after v3.14-rc1 has been released."

I have no problem with that particular patch being sent to Linus during
this merge window (in fact Paul intends to send whatever is left of the
series at the end of the merge window), but it makes me wonder about the
other commits that you have added to the gpio tree (and the pinctrl tree)
today.  Are they intended for this merge window or v3.15?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature