On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:20:38AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:On 2014-1-17 22:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:So ideally we should look for a better solution here.On 17/01/14 12:24, Hanjun Guo wrote:Just avoid build issues, can not foresee use of this in ARM64 :)--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.cThis is what I mentioned in other email. Do we really foresee use of this in
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
local_fiq_enable();
}
+unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
+
ARM64 or it's just added to avoid build issues ?