Re: [Q] L1_CACHE_BYTES on flush_pfn_alias function.
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Fri Jan 24 2014 - 10:43:59 EST
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:54:42AM +0000, ïïïïïï wrote:
> Follow the mailing-list
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/31686
>
> >>Setting the L1 cache line size larger than it actually is should be safe.
>
> the written code expected as L1_CACHE_BYTES should be real cache line size
> has bug.
> It looks like that flush_pfn_alias function should be fixed.
Did you actually notice any problem with flushing some more bytes? It's
a clean+invalidate rather than invalidate, I don't see any problem.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/