Re: [PATCH] x86, mm: Avoid extra pxm_to_node()

[David Rientjes]

On Sun, 26 Jan 2014, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat.c
> @@ -50,14 +50,19 @@ static __init inline int srat_disabled(v
>  void __init acpi_numa_slit_init(struct acpi_table_slit *slit)
>  {
>  	int i, j;
> +	int from_node, to_node;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < slit->locality_count; i++) {
> -		if (pxm_to_node(i) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +		from_node = pxm_to_node(i);
> +		if (from_node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>  			continue;
> +
>  		for (j = 0; j < slit->locality_count; j++) {
> -			if (pxm_to_node(j) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> +			to_node = pxm_to_node(j);
> +			if (to_node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>  				continue;
> -			numa_set_distance(pxm_to_node(i), pxm_to_node(j),
> +
> +			numa_set_distance(from_node, to_node,
>  				slit->entry[slit->locality_count * i + j]);
>  		}
>  	}

Might as well make them "const" while you're at it by moving the 
definitions inside the iteration blocks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/