Re: [PATCH] USB: input: gtco.c: fix usb_dev leak

[Alexey Khoroshilov]

On 27.01.2014 10:54, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:31:36AM +0400, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>> On 21.01.2014 23:59, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:24:26AM +0400, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>>>> There is usb_get_dev() in gtco_probe(), but there is no usb_put_dev()
>>>> anywhere in the driver.
>>>>
>>>> The patch adds usb_get_dev() to failure handling code of gtco_probe()
>>>> and to gtco_disconnect(().
>>> Hmm, I think gtco should simply not use usb_get_dev() in the first
>>> place.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>> Dear Dmitry,
>>
>> Could you please clarify why usb_get_dev() not needed here?
>> We store reference to usb_dev in gtco structure, so we should refcount it.
>> What is wrong in this reasoning?
> The lifetime of gtco structure is already directly tied to lifetime of
> usb_dev: when destroying usb_dev driver core will call remove() function
> of currently bound driver (in our case gtco) which will destroy gtco
> memory.
>
> Taking additional reference is not needed here.
>
> Hope this helps.
Thank you, that helps a lot.

By the way, usb_skeleton suggests to use usb_get_dev()/usb_put_dev()
nevertheless.

Greg, may be it makes sense to fix usb_skeleton as well?

--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/