On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.cDon't we already leave some artifact in the kernel log at boot about apic
index c9311be..c29c2c3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
if (apic_id < 0) {
- acpi_handle_err(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
+ acpi_handle_debug(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
ids that don't get registered? I'm wondering if we should have this
warning at all.