On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, David Rientjes wrote:
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 81b2750..ebefeb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -562,10 +562,10 @@ static void __init numa_init_array(void)
}
}
+static nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes __initdata;
static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
{
int i, nid;
- nodemask_t numa_kernel_nodes;
unsigned long start, end;
struct memblock_type *type =&memblock.reserved;
Isn't this also a bugfix since you never initialize numa_kernel_nodes when
it's allocated on the stack with NODE_MASK_NONE?
This hasn't been answered and the patch still isn't in linux-kernel yet
Dave tested it as good. I'm suspicious of the changelog that indicates
this nodemask is the result of a stack overflow itself which only manages
to reproduce itself in the init patch slightly more than 50% of the time.
How is that possible?
I think the changelog should indicate this also fixes an uninitialized
nodemask issue.