Re: [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:16:34 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here's a set that seems to work properly and hopefully adresses all previously
> raised issues.
> 
> Daniel, I'm sorry, the idle_stamp thing wandered back over to fair.c :-)
> 
> I did test the fair bits, including bandwidth (although not very
> extensively).
> 
> I did not test the dl/rt bits, Steve do you have a testcase for that?


My sched tests are usually done by running some scheduling tests while
recording sched switches and then analyzing it under kernelshark. I
don't have many other tests that do pass fail. Hmm, I did have a couple
of rt migration tests, but that's it.

I'll take a look at theses tomorrow.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/