Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation

[Tommaso Cucinotta]

On 28/01/14 09:31, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Exactly. I can remember also a huge period might be harmful, because with it
>> even a tiny utilization may lead to a big runtime that starves the whole non
>> RT tasks for a significant time. 
> 
> Another way to solve that is with explicit slack time scheduling, where
> slack here means the time/utilization not allocated to dl tasks (a quick
> google shows various different usages of slack, including laxity).
> 
> So suppose we have 50% utilization but with a huge period, we could
> schedule the other 50% at a fixed but smaller period and have that run
> the rt/fair/etc tasks.
> 
> So effectively we'll always fill up the utilization to 100% and use the
> 'slack' time as a server for the other classes.

Yesss :-)! Indeed, AFAICR in the AQuoSA API there was the QOS_F_DEFAULT flag

  http://aquosa.sourceforge.net/aquosa-docs/aquosa-qosres/html/qos__types_8h_source.html

(that could only be set by a  privileged process) just there to allow
for creating a server serving "default" tasks (namely, every non-aquosa task).
This way, you could create for example at system boot time a default
reservation with a precise (runtime, period) for Linux, so that non-aquosa
tasks could have a chance to run in that reservation, even in presence of
a RT reservation with a significantly long runtime.

	T.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/