Re: math_state_restore and kernel_fpu_end disable interrupts?

[George Spelvin]

> I'm trying it now.  But it takes a while for me to reproduce, and even
> longer to be sure the problem has gone away.  So anything you hear from
> me within a week will be bad news.

Well, it's been a week, and: good news!

I'd still wish for some review by someone who really understands this
code; in particular it seems dangerous to just enable interrupts for
a window without re-checking the condition afterward.

What if an interrupt hander wants to use the FPU and triggers the
allocate itself?  Shouldn't it be:
* Enable interrupts
* Allocate
* Disable interrupts
* Check that tsk->thread.xstate is still NULL
* (If it has been filled in, free and return.)
* Fill in tsk->thread.xstate

I don't feel I really understand the irq_fpu_usable() logic in
arch/x86/i387.c.

But this patch clearly doesn't make these issues any *worse*, so
these concerns are no reason to block it.


Would you like add an appropriate commit message and send in the patch?

Something like:

Subject: arch/x86/kernel/traps.c: make math_state_restore preserve IRQ status.

Commit aa283f4927 (in 2.6.26!) to add lazy FPU save are allocation did
an local_irq_enable()/local_irq_disable() around the allocate.  However,
that assumes that it is only called with interrupts disabled.

math_state_restore() can also be called from kernel_fpu_end() with
interrupts enabled.  Very occasionally, this triggers an FPU state
allocation.  Disabling interrupts unconditionally is Bad.

Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Nate Eldredge <nate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: aa283f4927
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/