Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: ignore arguments to %n

[Ryan Mallon]

On 29/01/14 09:51, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 28/01/14 11:39, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> If arguments are consumed without output when encountering %n, it
>>> could be used to benefit or improve information leak attacks that were
>>> exposed via a limited size buffer. Since %n is not used by the kernel,
>>> there is no reason to make an info leak attack any easier.
>>
>> I was thinking more like the following. Print the warning if %n is
>> detected in format_decode(), but otherwise just remove the handling of
>> %n outright and treat it like any other invalid format specifier.
>> Something like this completely untested patch. Thoughts?
> 
> I'd be totally fine with it. Minor typo in the comment before the
> WARN_ONCE (should be "its" instead of "it"), but otherwise looks good.
> Consider it:
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It builds and boots fine for me, FWIW.
> 
> -Kees
> 


It looks like your second version already got added to Andrew's mm tree.
I'm happy to repost mine with a fixed typo and proper signed-off by if
you'd rather use that version.

~Ryan
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/