On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 18:02 +0100, Christoph Fritz wrote:On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
Due to a regression since next-20140122 the following errors are present:
- pin sys_clkout2, which gets configured to 24 Mhz by the fourth patch
in this set, erroneously outputs only 12 Mhz.
Just out of curiosity, configuring it to 48 Mhz puts out desired 24 Mhz.
- omap_dss, which gets configured by the third patch in this set, fails
to do 'dss_set_fck_rate(fck);' in
drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c:dss_setup_default_clock() which leads to:
| omapdss_dss: probe of omapdss_dss failed with error -22
| omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize DSS platform driver
| panel-dpi panel-dpi.0: failed to find video source 'dpi.0
Both regressions seem to have something to do with the clock framework.
Could this be related to the DT clock conversion patches?
Yea its definitely possible, as the clock DT conversion touches pretty
much everything. Have you tried whether this works properly with legacy
boot? Personally I don't have access to any omap3 devices that would
have display and have no possibility to check this out myself. Anyway,
my initial guess is that some clock divider setup might be wrong with
omap3, or we are missing some ti,set-rate-parent flag for some clock
node which prevents escalating clk_set_rate properly. However, it should
be easy to debug this by looking at the clock node in question, and its
parent nodes to see if there are any problems.
Currently I only analyzed sys_clkout2 (see attachments for full
clk_summary files):
clk_summary__next-20140115__works_as_expected:
dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 96000000
omap_192m_alwon_fck 1 1 96000000
omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 96000000
per_96m_fck 0 6 96000000
mcbsp4_fck 0 1 96000000
mcbsp3_fck 0 2 96000000
mcbsp2_fck 0 2 96000000
cm_96m_fck 2 3 96000000
clkout2_src_ck 1 1 96000000
sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are correctly 24 Mhz measured.
clk_summary__next-20140124__sysclkout2_dss_fails:
dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1 1 192000000
dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 192000000
omap_192m_alwon_fck 0 0 192000000
omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 192000000
per_96m_fck 0 6 192000000
mcbsp4_fck 0 1 192000000
mcbsp3_fck 0 2 192000000
mcbsp2_fck 0 2 192000000
cm_96m_fck 2 3 192000000
clkout2_src_ck 1 1 192000000
sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are only ~12 Mhz measured.
So I added this patch:
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix omap3 clock multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck
Before DT clock conversion, there was no multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck.
So to be compatible again, set dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck multiplier back to 1.
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
index cb04d4b..b594050 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
clocks = <&dpll4_m2_ck>;
- clock-mult = <2>;
+ clock-mult = <1>;
clock-div = <1>;
};
And it works again. But due to the fact that sys_clkout2 was at 12 Mhz
instead of 24, shouldn't it have been at 48 caused by "clock-mult = 2 ?
Any ideas on that?
I reverted the patch above and added:
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:03:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap36xx: fix omap96m_alwon_fck
OMAP36xx has different hardware implementation for the omap96m_alwon_fck
compared to other OMAP3 variants. Reflect this properly in the dts file.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
index 2fcf253..24ddf3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -88,3 +88,12 @@
<&mcbsp4_ick>, <&uart4_fck>;
};
};
+
+&omap_96m_alwon_fck {
+ compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+ clocks = <&omap_192m_alwon_fck>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <12>;
+ ti,max-div = <2>;
+ reg = <0x0a40>;
+ ti,index-starts-at-one;
+};
But the output of sys_clkout2 is still wrong.
clk_summary__next-20140124__patch_tero_fix_omap96m_alwon_fck
dpll4_m2_ck 1 1 96000000
dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1 1 192000000
dpll4_m2x2_ck 1 1 192000000
omap_192m_alwon_fck 1 1 192000000
omap_96m_alwon_fck 1 2 192000000
per_96m_fck 0 6 192000000
mcbsp4_fck 0 1 192000000
mcbsp3_fck 0 2 192000000
mcbsp2_fck 0 2 192000000
cm_96m_fck 2 3 192000000
clkout2_src_ck 1 1 192000000
sys_clkout2 1 1 24000000
Thanks
-- Christoph