Re: [PATCH V3 4/8] phy: Initialize phy core with subsys_initcall

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

Hi,

On Thursday 30 January 2014 05:22 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:43:37PM +0800, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 30 January 2014 04:18 PM, Mohit Kumar wrote:
>>> From: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> PCIe RC drivers are initialized with subsys_initcall. Few PCIe drivers
>>> like SPEAr13xx needs phy drivers to be initialized.
>>
>> Instead change PCIe RC drivers to module init. Phy drivers should be loaded
>> very early otherwise. (Hint: drivers/Makefile).
> 
> I think PCIe RC driver can not be made module init. Bjorn can comment
> better.

Why not? I have used it for DRA7xx without any issues (I'll send that one
upstream once the PIPE3 phy part gets clear).
> 
> All PCIe card drivers are initialized with module init. RC driver must
> have been initialized before any card driver initialization.
> Currently, card drivers does not have deferred probe concept, so I am
> not sure if keeping RC driver as module init will work always.

the card drivers will anyway be probed only after RC driver comes up no?
> 
> By the way, is there any side effect of loading phy driver very early?

I assume you meant 'is there any side effect of using subsys_initcall?', since
phy driver is loaded early anyway.
The answer is no just that module_init is common one and more people prefer to
use module_init. (btw initial versions of phy-core had susbsys_initcall before
it got changed to use module_init)

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/