Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: add Crypto Extensions based synchronous coreAES cipher
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Thu Jan 30 2014 - 14:20:53 EST
On 30 January 2014 19:56, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:50:46PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b5a5d5d6e4b8
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
>> +/*
>> + * linux/arch/arm64/crypto/aes-ce-cipher.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Ltd <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <asm/neon.h>
>> +#include <crypto/aes.h>
>> +#include <linux/crypto.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpufeature.h>
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Synchronous AES cipher using ARMv8 Crypto Extensions");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +
>> +static void aes_cipher_encrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 dst[], u8 const src[])
>> +{
>> + struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>> + u32 rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
>
> Can you document these constants please?
>
Sure.
>> +
>> + kernel_neon_begin();
>> +
>> + __asm__(" ld1 {v0.16b}, [%[in]] ;"
>> + " ld1 {v1.16b}, [%[key]], #16 ;"
>> + "0: aese v0.16b, v1.16b ;"
>> + " subs %[rounds], %[rounds], #1 ;"
>> + " ld1 {v1.16b}, [%[key]], #16 ;"
>> + " beq 1f ;"
>> + " aesmc v0.16b, v0.16b ;"
>> + " b 0b ;"
>> + "1: eor v0.16b, v0.16b, v1.16b ;"
>> + " st1 {v0.16b}, [%[out]] ;"
>> + : :
>> + [out] "r"(dst),
>> + [in] "r"(src),
>> + [rounds] "r"(rounds),
>> + [key] "r"(ctx->key_enc)
>> + : "cc");
>
> You probably need a memory output to stop this being re-ordered by the
> compiler. Can GCC not generate the addressing modes you need directly,
> allowing you to avoid moving everything into registers?
>
Would a memory clobber work as well?
Re addressing modes: I would prefer to explicitly use v0 and v1, I
have another patch pending that allows partial saves/restores of the
NEON register file when called from interrupt context. I suppose I
could use 'register asm("v0")' or something like that, but that won't
make it any prettier.
>
>> + kernel_neon_end();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void aes_cipher_decrypt(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, u8 dst[], u8 const src[])
>> +{
>> + struct crypto_aes_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
>> + u32 rounds = 6 + ctx->key_length / 4;
>> +
>> + kernel_neon_begin();
>> +
>> + __asm__(" ld1 {v0.16b}, [%[in]] ;"
>> + " ld1 {v1.16b}, [%[key]], #16 ;"
>> + "0: aesd v0.16b, v1.16b ;"
>> + " ld1 {v1.16b}, [%[key]], #16 ;"
>> + " subs %[rounds], %[rounds], #1 ;"
>> + " beq 1f ;"
>> + " aesimc v0.16b, v0.16b ;"
>> + " b 0b ;"
>> + "1: eor v0.16b, v0.16b, v1.16b ;"
>> + " st1 {v0.16b}, [%[out]] ;"
>> + : :
>> + [out] "r"(dst),
>> + [in] "r"(src),
>> + [rounds] "r"(rounds),
>> + [key] "r"(ctx->key_dec)
>> + : "cc");
>
> Same comments here.
>
> FWIW: I spoke to the guy at ARM who designed the crypto instructions and he
> reckons your code works :)
>
Good!
Care to comment on the rest of the series?
Cheers.
Ard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/