Re: [RFC PATCH] net: wireless: move regulatory timeout work to powerefficient workqueue

From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Jan 31 2014 - 04:35:52 EST

Next message: Johannes Berg: "Re: [RFC PATCH] net: wireless: move regulatory timeout work topower efficient workqueue"
Previous message: Sander Eikelenboom: "[PATCH v2] Setting the IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW flag on a VGA card other than the primary prevents it from reading it's own rom. It will get the content of the shadowrom at C000 instead, which is of the primary VGA card and the driver of the secondary card will bail out."
In reply to: Johannes Berg: "Re: [RFC PATCH] net: wireless: move regulatory timeout work topower efficient workqueue"
Next in thread: Johannes Berg: "Re: [RFC PATCH] net: wireless: move regulatory timeout work topower efficient workqueue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is part of a larger patchset actually adding that
> "system_power_efficient_wq", but maybe it'd be better to expose a
> function as an API rather than the wq struct?
>
> Something like
>
> scheduled_delayed_work_pwr_efficient(...)?

While there are some benefits to using dedicated functions for
specific workqueues, I don't think it brings enough benefits to
justify adding dedicated API and am unlikely to add new ones.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/