Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] can: sja1000: cleanups and new OF property

[Florian Vaussard]

On 01/31/2014 02:50 PM, Andreas Larsson wrote:
> On 2014-01-31 14:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 01/31/2014 02:34 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> (could someone with a SJA1000 on SPARC perform a functional test
>>> to see if interrupts are working? it would be great :-)
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> - Dropped patch 1 "can: sja1000: remove unused defines"
>>> - Addressed Marc's comments on patch 4 and 6 (now 3 and 5)
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Merge sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c (patch 4)
>>>
>>> The first part of this series performs serveral small cleanups
>>> (patches 1 and 2).
>>>
>>> Patch 3 merges sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c.
>>> Changes are pretty conservatives (mostly copy/paste/move). IRQ
>>> is treated differently in the OF and non-OF versions, thus this
>>> is where the fused version differs the most.
>>>
>>> The final part introduces the 'reg-io-width' binding (already used
>>> by some other drivers) to perform a similar job as what was done
>>> with IORESOURCE_MEM_XXBIT. This is needed on my system to correctly
>>> take into account the aliasing of the address bus.
>>>
>>> All patches were tested using OF boot on my OMAP3 system with a
>>> memory-mapped SJA1000. Thus, the non-OF path is not tested, as
>>> I do not have a platform data at hand.
>>
>> Nice, looks good now. I'll give Andreas some time to test on sparc and
>> then apply the patches.
> 
> 
> I am on it. I will dig up some hardware for this on Monday to test it.
> 

Many thanks :o)

(be careful to enable CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM, as I removed
CAN_SJA1000_PLATFORM_OF)

Regards,
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/