Re: [PATCH v2] gpio-intel-mid: fix the incorrect return of idlecallback

[Felipe Balbi]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 01:08:01PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> From: "xinhui.pan" <xinhuiX.pan@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> intel_gpio_runtime_idle should return correct error code if it do fail.
> make it more correct even though -EBUSY is the most possible return value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: bo.he <bo.he@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: xinhui.pan <xinhuiX.pan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Felibe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> index 41218e93b9fe..55688d0548e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> @@ -369,8 +369,8 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops intel_gpio_irq_ops = {
>  
>  static int intel_gpio_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> -	return -EBUSY;
> +	int err = pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> +	return err ?: -EBUSY;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_gpio_pm_ops = {
> -- 
> 1.8.4.2
> 

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature