Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add 32 bit VDSO time support for 32 bit kernel

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/01/2014 03:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>   If it is, indeed, okay to use non-fixed maps on 32-bit, it might
>> also be okay on 64-bit.  If so, it could be useful to implement that,
>> which would remove a bit of a wart and allow PR_SET_TSC to work
>> usefully for 64-bit userspace.  (This would remove the need for the
>> VVAR macro and would allow shorter rip-relative address modes.)
>>
>
> We can't really move the 64-bit legacy vsyscall area, though, as it is
> an ABI.  It can be disabled with vsyscall=none, but Linus has vehemently
> vetoed removing them.

VVAR != vsyscall.  They've been different pages since I wrote the
vsyscall emulation stuff.  Any userspace code that relies on any of
the contents of the VVAR page is totally screwed already, since the
layout changes semi-regularly and depends on whether lockdep is
enabled.

>
>>  (Note that those fixmaps are a security problem on native 32-bit if
>> NX is not available.  We may not care.)
>
> Not only on native 32 bit... although the amount of 64-bit hardware
> without NX is quite small, the same is true for anywhere near modern
> 32-bit hardware.

<irrelevant>It can't be a problem for 32-bit compat mode, though,
since userspace can't address the fixmap anyway.</irrelevant>

>
>>>
>>> -#define VDSO_HIGH_BASE         0xffffe000U /* CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO address */
>>> +#define VDSO_HIGH_BASE         0xffffc000U /* CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO address */
>>
>> This is odd.  Can you explain it?
>>
>
> He needs 3 pages instead of 1 after his changes.

Right.  But there's some obscure ABI reason for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO,
and if this breaks it, then it's no good.  From extremely vague
memory, there's some version of SuSE that breaks if the 32-bit vdso
moves.  I have no idea what the bug is, but moving a "compat" address
seems suspect.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/