Re: [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sat Feb 01 2014 - 20:51:17 EST
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So if the restore failed, we should do something like drop_init_fpu(),
> which will restore init-state to the registers.
>
> for eager-fpu() paths we don't use clts() stts() etc.
Uhhuh. Ok.
Why do we do that, btw? I think it would make much more sense to just
do what I *thought* we did, and just make it a context-switch-time
optimization ("let's always switch FP state"), not make it a huge
semantic difference.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/